Story Time

I’m hiring again, this time for a Director of Engineering. A requirement for application is submitting a cover letter, which apparently has fallen out of favor? Enough so that one candidate DM-ed me on the side to let me know our recruiting tool was misconfigured for having the field non-optional. Nope!

Personally, I enjoy reading cover letters, because they tell me something more than just what a resume can. It’s the same reason I want to hear real stories in interviews. They’re especially useful in revealing the “why” behind an application, which, in the line of work I do, is especially important.

Producing them does require some effort, which is a feature not a bug, but hopefully not too tough because you do document your work, right? And it’s getting even easier with AI, which I have no problem with a person using to get a cover letter started, given a thoughtful prompt that customizes the result to the job, the company to which you’re applying, and unique details about the applicant.

Speaking of “why” and AI, the other day I had a potential candidate ask me why I chose to join my current company. Great question! I put Claude to the test, again giving it my entire blog corpus as reference:

Based on the content of your blog, your reasons for leaving AWS to join RIPL as Chief Technology Officer can be summarized as follows:

1. Mission-driven work: You've expressed a strong interest in using technology to improve people's lives and promote human flourishing. RIPL's mission to work with governments to help them use data, science, and technology to improve policy and lives aligns well with this interest.

2. Intersection of technology and public policy: You mentioned that you've "doubled-down on situating myself at the intersection of tech and politics." RIPL's focus on working with governments to improve policy through technology is a perfect fit for this goal.

3. New challenges: You've indicated a desire for work that isn't a "solved problem." Moving to RIPL likely offers new and unique challenges that weren't present at AWS.

4. Leadership opportunity: The CTO role at RIPL allows you to have a more significant impact on the organization's direction and strategy, which aligns with your growing interest in leadership roles.

5. Building from the ground up: You've expressed enjoyment in creating and building things. A smaller, more focused organization like RIPL might offer more opportunities to build systems and processes from scratch.

6. Applying cloud expertise: Your extensive experience with AWS can be directly applied to help governments leverage cloud technologies for public good.

7. Ethical considerations: You've shown interest in the ethical implications of technology. RIPL's focus on improving government policies likely involves careful consideration of these ethical aspects.

8. Desire for meaningful impact: Your blog suggests a strong desire to make a significant positive impact. The role at RIPL seems to offer a more direct path to seeing the results of your work in terms of improved public policies and services.

While you didn't explicitly list these reasons in a single post, they can be inferred from your various writings about your interests, values, and career trajectory. The move appears to be a natural progression that combines your technical expertise with your interest in public service and desire for impactful work.

Like my request from the other day, that’s pretty accurate! I wonder what other uses I can find for an LLM whose context window is big enough for nearly 9 years of writing…